Online Personals Watch
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • News by Company & Categories
    • News by Date
    • All Online Dating Statistics
    • Public Companies
    • Acquisitions
    • Funding Rounds
    • Top Online Dating Reporters
    • OPW in the Press
    • All Executive Interviews
  • Conferences
  • Courtland Brooks
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
Menu

Category: Chemistry

Chemistry.com Says ‘Come As You Are’

Posted on April 30, 2007

ChemistryPR NEWSWIRE — Apr 30 — Chemistry.com today announced the launch of a provocative marketing campaign that highlights differences between it and eHarmony and includes network television, print advertising, and online elements depicting men and women who wonder aloud why they have been "rejected" by eHarmony. Chemistry.com is also launching "The Great Mate Debate" blog with five world-class writers, thinkers and influencers discussing issues each week. The dialogue will address gay unions, divorce, marriage in the 21st century, and how relationships are being redefined.

The full article was originally published at PR Newswire, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Patrick Perrine runs MyPartnerPerfect.com and is a proponent of gay long term relationship dating and matchmaking. He covers similar ground at patrickperrine.com. It's generally considered very bad practice to mention competition in your advertising and be derogatory towards competition, but hey, that's old school. I guess it's  good to see Match.com thinking more freely and losing the chains of old school marketing and PR. Is it cool to hack away at eHarmony though? Does eHarmony deserve this treatment? Your comments please…

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Chemistry.com Says ‘Come As You Are’

Posted on April 30, 2007

ChemistryPR NEWSWIRE — Apr 30 — Chemistry.com today announced the launch of a provocative marketing campaign that highlights differences between it and eHarmony and includes network television, print advertising, and online elements depicting men and women who wonder aloud why they have been "rejected" by eHarmony. Chemistry.com is also launching "The Great Mate Debate" blog with five world-class writers, thinkers and influencers discussing issues each week. The dialogue will address gay unions, divorce, marriage in the 21st century, and how relationships are being redefined.

The full article was originally published at PR Newswire, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Patrick Perrine runs MyPartnerPerfect.com and is a proponent of gay long term relationship dating and matchmaking. He covers similar ground at patrickperrine.com. It's generally considered very bad practice to mention competition in your advertising and be derogatory towards competition, but hey, that's old school. I guess it's  good to see Match.com thinking more freely and losing the chains of old school marketing and PR. Is it cool to hack away at eHarmony though? Does eHarmony deserve this treatment? Your comments please…

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Meetic Intends to Acquire DatingDirect

Posted on January 8, 2007

Meetic_logo_1REUTERS — Jan 8 — Meetic signed an agreement with a view to acquiring DatingDirect, UK's leading online dating service. Founded in 1999, DatingDirect has 4.5 million members (3.5 million in the UK), 70,000 paying members, 1.6 million uniques a month and £11 million annual revenue. Meetic has also signed an agreement for the acquisition, from the same shareholders, of Chemistry.co.uk which organizes UK singles events. Dating Direct has marketing partnerships with AOL, Channel4.com, HeartFM.co.uk, iVillage.co.uk, NTL and Tiscali. The acquisition of DatingDirect and Chemistry, for £27.3 million, will be carried out entirely in cash once the operation is finalised.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Meetic Intends to Acquire DatingDirect

Posted on January 8, 2007

Meetic_logo_1REUTERS — Jan 8 — Meetic signed an agreement with a view to acquiring DatingDirect, UK's leading online dating service. Founded in 1999, DatingDirect has 4.5 million members (3.5 million in the UK), 70,000 paying members, 1.6 million uniques a month and £11 million annual revenue. Meetic has also signed an agreement for the acquisition, from the same shareholders, of Chemistry.co.uk which organizes UK singles events. Dating Direct has marketing partnerships with AOL, Channel4.com, HeartFM.co.uk, iVillage.co.uk, NTL and Tiscali. The acquisition of DatingDirect and Chemistry, for £27.3 million, will be carried out entirely in cash once the operation is finalised.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Online Dating Subscription Fees

Posted on March 7, 2006

Eharmony_6I-NEWSWIRE — Mar 2 — Some people argue that charging people $50 a month is too much. I say it's not enough. People use price as a filter. That's why matchmakers charge $5,000.  At Chemistry and Eharmony, the value is not only the enhanced matching algorithm, you're paying more so you don't have to spend hours each week looking at profiles. Paying more to do less.  Myspace is the exact opposite. Match had a $500 service at one point, I think it lasted about 3 months.

The full article was originally published at i-Newswire, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: The online dating world can learn from the real world matchmakers.  We're leaving money on the table.  Many people just don't have the time to invest in online dating (or real world dating).  They will gladly pay $2000+ a year for the end result of being set up on dates with compatible singles every week or two.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Seattle, Online Dating Mecca

Posted on November 21, 2005

Sperlings_best_placesBLOOMBERG — Nov 18 — The Web-based Sperling's BestPlaces guide this month ranked Seattle the #1 place in the U.S. to hook up, based on 33 factors, including male-to-female parity, membership in online dating services and the number of coffee shops and dog parks.  Match.com chose Seattle as one of four cities in the country to test a new dating site called chemistry.com, designed for people "actively seeking meaningful long-term relationships." There are 186,480 Seattle Match members, ~6.1% of the population of 3 million. That's the highest proportion of online daters among the 12 largest metropolitan areas. 47% of men and 40% of women in Seattle have never married. 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Seattle, Online Dating Mecca

Posted on November 21, 2005

Sperlings_best_placesBLOOMBERG — Nov 18 — The Web-based Sperling's BestPlaces guide this month ranked Seattle the #1 place in the U.S. to hook up, based on 33 factors, including male-to-female parity, membership in online dating services and the number of coffee shops and dog parks.  Match.com chose Seattle as one of four cities in the country to test a new dating site called chemistry.com, designed for people "actively seeking meaningful long-term relationships." There are 186,480 Seattle Match members, ~6.1% of the population of 3 million. That's the highest proportion of online daters among the 12 largest metropolitan areas. 47% of men and 40% of women in Seattle have never married. 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

A Guide to Dating Sites for Niche Interests

Posted on November 1, 2005

SEATTLE TIMES — Oct 30 — There are the shopping-mall dating sites (Match.com, Yahoo! Personals), then there are the boutiques. JDate.com; Jewish singles community. Engage.com; a social networking site where your friends set you up.  DateMyPet.com; hookup for yourself and your pet.  Teamdating.com; girl-friends join to meet guy-friends go out in a group.  Fitsingles.com; for people who like to run, hike, kayak, cycle and do pull-ups in doorways.  DegreeDate.com; for the educated. SingleParentMeet.com & SingleParentsMingle.com; first you've got to impress your date – then your date's kids.  Chemistry.com; uses an eHarmony-style compatibility test – rejection can take weeks instead of minutes. SpiritSingles.com; new-age site where spiritual integrity trumps the shallow pursuit for hot babes. Riiigghhht.

The full article was originally published at Seattle Times, but is no longer available.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

C’mon, Baby, Light my Brain Cells

Posted on October 17, 2005

YAHOO NEWS — Oct 13 — Helen Fisher, an anthropologist and research professor at Rutgers University's Center for Human Evolutionary Studies, specializes in love, marriage, and gender differences. She's the author of four books, including her most recent, titled Why We Love: The Nature and Chemistry of Romantic Love. She believes that the type of person we are attracted to is hardwired into our neurons, etched by a combination of hormones, brain chemicals, and childhood experiences.  As an adviser to new spinoff, Chemistry.com (backed by Match.com), Fisher is trying to quantify that certain something we're all looking for in a mate. "Most people fall in love because they have shared values, but they stay in love because their personalities mesh.  Childhood also plays an enormous role in shaping likes and dislikes.  I want to know not only what your brain chemistry is, but what was successful for you in the past.  What really astonishes me is that I came up with four basic personality types in my research, and these same four types have been described by Plato, Aristotle, Carl Jung, Myers-Briggs." One of the questions on Chemistry.com asks how long your index finger is compared to your ring finger. A person with an index finger shorter than the ring finger will have been exposed to more testosterone while in the womb, and a person with an index finger longer than the ring finger will have had more estrogen. In women, the two fingers are usually equal in length, as measured from the crease nearest the palm to the fingertip. In men, the ring finger tends to be much longer than the index finger.

Mark Brooks: My interview with Jim Safka, Match.com CEO, goes live on OPW on Tuesday.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

The Match Game and how Search Stinks

Posted on October 12, 2005

Fast_company_1— Oct 11 — Match.com has launched Chemistry.com (Denver, Seattle, San Diego, Washington D.C.) using matching technology rather than search technology.  You answer questions and then a computer algorithm finds matches . Now I'm going to surrender my control to let the computer do all the work for me?   Here's the thing, though: Search doesn't work. Match.com believes there's a large audience who want a more structured online dating experience and who'll pay a premium.  Alas, matching is still highly unproven. You have to devote about 40 minutes at the outset to completing a profile in the hopes that it'll bear fruit in the end. In my experience, the harvest is a long way off.   I think that matching has to get more sophisticated–and quickly. Chemistry's answers are either geared in such a way that you don't have any bad traits, only lesser degrees of positive ones, or they make it so that any reasonable person would answer "Sometimes" almost every place it's offered as a response. In the end, you're left with a middle-of-the-road profile that's going to mean that you're still most likely to get paired up with a mate based on whether you both smoke or not rather than based on how likely you both are to share your feelings. On the whole, I'm bullish on the idea of matching technology. 

The full article was originally published at Fast Company, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Matching holds high promise.  Is it delivering right now?  If not, when will it deliver?  Please comment?  TRUE uses the only validated test I've come across yet btw. 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • Next
  • YouTube
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
Graphic featuring the logo of Courtland Brooks with the text 'We'll Help You Grow, Thrive & Exit' and bullet points for services including Strategy, Marketing, PR, Influencers, and Business Development.

OUR EVENTS

A blurred audience in a large venue with colorful lighting, featuring the bold text 'LTR US' in the foreground.

OUR SPONSORS

Logo of HubPeople featuring geometric shapes and the text 'HubPeople' in a modern font.
Logo of LeadThink, featuring the tagline 'YOUR GROWTH STARTS WITH US' and the description 'The #1 Destination for Early to Late-Stage Startups' in a combination of blue and pink text.

GOT NEWS?

Share your news at
tips@onlinepersonalswatch.com.

COURTLAND BROOKS

We help online dating & social businesses grow, thrive, and exit. See CourtlandBrooks.com.

CONTACT

Mark Brooks
CEO, Courtland Brooks
Publisher, Online Personals Watch
mark@courtlandbrooks.com

Irena Brooks
Editor, Online Personals Watch
irena@courtlandbrooks.com

©2026 Online Personals Watch