Online Personals Watch
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • News by Company & Categories
    • News by Date
    • All Online Dating Statistics
    • Public Companies
    • Acquisitions
    • Funding Rounds
    • Top Online Dating Reporters
    • OPW in the Press
    • All Executive Interviews
  • Conferences
  • Courtland Brooks
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
Menu

Category: Outlets – Wired

Best Way to Date: Collaborate?

Posted on March 20, 2006

collaboradate  WIRED NEWS — Mar 17 — Collaboradate does for online dating what Trillian does for instant messaging: It combines multiple services so you can manage everything from one place.  When you create your Collaboradate profile, you enter the user names you registered at other dating and social networking sites. Then when someone searches Collaboradate and finds you, she can click through each site on your list to view your dating profiles.  If the external dating site requires membership to view profiles, she'll have to sign in. But if it doesn't — like Yahoo Personals, Friendster and MySpace — she can see your page immediately.  Andy believes the subscription model for dating is doomed, and suggests that Collaboradate will be a positive force for online dating as a whole. 

The full article was originally published at Wired News, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Paid subscriptions help sort out the more committed online daters.  When you're paying $20-$50 a month, your attention is pretty much ensured.  I'd like to see more sites where ONLY paid members are visible and can play. 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Who’s Afraid of Google? Everyone.

Posted on November 25, 2005

GoogleWIRED MAGAZINE — Nov 25 — Even in the early days Google's ultimate goal was extravagant: to organize the world's information.  Whereas Microsoft infamously smothered new and open standards, Google is famous for supporting them. And the firm is softening its image, launching a philanthropic arm,  Google.org, with nearly $1 billion earmarked for social causes. When secrecy-obsessed Google let news of "Google Base" slip, it looked like an aggressive entrée into online classifieds. The test service can search ads like used-car and personals listings, which would mesh with Google Local and might even kick-start Orkut, Google's social network.  Who's threatened: craigslist, eBay, Monster, Tribe.net. 

The full article was originally published at Wired Magazine, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: At $500 million revenue a year, the internet dating industry is still off Google's radar…we hope

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Who’s Afraid of Google? Everyone.

Posted on November 25, 2005

GoogleWIRED MAGAZINE — Nov 25 — Even in the early days Google's ultimate goal was extravagant: to organize the world's information.  Whereas Microsoft infamously smothered new and open standards, Google is famous for supporting them. And the firm is softening its image, launching a philanthropic arm,  Google.org, with nearly $1 billion earmarked for social causes. When secrecy-obsessed Google let news of "Google Base" slip, it looked like an aggressive entrée into online classifieds. The test service can search ads like used-car and personals listings, which would mesh with Google Local and might even kick-start Orkut, Google's social network.  Who's threatened: craigslist, eBay, Monster, Tribe.net. 

The full article was originally published at Wired Magazine, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: At $500 million revenue a year, the internet dating industry is still off Google's radar…we hope

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Dating Sites Rekindle the Flame

Posted on August 2, 2005

Wired_news— July 29 — Seeking someone who's a "giver," a "rebel" or an "observer"? Yahoo Personals now lets you search for them. Dying to know if Ms. Right is a philanderer or a felon? True will run a  background check. Online-dating sites raked in $473 million from American customers in 2004, according to JupiterResearch, which expects revenue to reach $516 million this year. At the same time, it's becoming more expensive for dating sites to advertise online and woo enough new customers to create a viable site, said Mark Brooks, an industry consultant who blogs about the business. "We're going through the big squeeze," he said, "One in which consolidation looms and innovation is key to survival."  True, for one, allows so-called "bidirectional blocking": Users can block other members forever and decide who can peruse their own ads. "Basically," said True chief psychologist Jim Houran, "you're really empowering clients."  Big deal, sniffs Nate Elliott, an analyst with JupiterResearch. The bells and whistles "don't really matter to customers," he said. "If you give them a large number of photos and profiles, they're happy. Beyond that, it's all incremental."  Niche marketing sites include BlackPeopleMeet.com, Christian Mingle and BBWHarmony (BBW stands for "big beautiful women"), along with "adult" sites for the instant-gratification crowd. The quickie-oriented sites are growing rapidly, but "they've flown under the radar," said Brooks. Mark Thompson, CEO of weAttract.com, thinks short video clips are the future. "Jump ahead 10 years, and it will all be video-based." FULL ARTICLE @ WIRED NEWS

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Net Dating Is Painful Reality TV

Posted on July 27, 2005

HookingupWIRED NEWS– July 22 — Reality TV is so terribly fake. Still, I thought it was important that I watch ABC’s new series Hooking Up, which follows a dozen New York women on their year-long online dating journeys. The show barely pays attention to the internet. The show ends up as just a series of dates caught on camera. And it’s like watching a handful of your most clueless acquaintances stumble through one botched romantic encounter after another.

The full article was originally published at Wired News, but is no longer available.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Where the Gang Goes to Bang

Posted on June 24, 2005

Wired_news_4 WIRED — June 21 — Harriet turned to Tribe.net and started a "tribe" called Gangbang Girls to promote frank, uninhibited discussion of her secret fantasy. "I decided to…demonstrate that even the most stigmatized stuff can be discussed publicly, if done right." Gangbang Girls is just one of dozens of sexually themed tribes on Tribe. Other examples include Nymphomaniacs and the Smart Girls' Porn Club. Perhaps because of its San Francisco roots, Tribe has always attracted an artistic membership, one that seems more comfortable delving into alternative lifestyles than some of its more mainstream competitors. 

The full article was originally published at Wired, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Wired has been turning out some racy articles of late.  The top adult personals sites are listed in the left bar.  Craigslist also has it's casual encounters. The adult sites are some of the most trafficed personals corners on the net.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

We’ll Always Have ICQ

Posted on April 28, 2005

Wired_news_1 WIRED — Apr 22 — It has almost become mainstream to start relationships on the internet. Dr. Marilyn Volker, a Miami-based sexologist who has been in practice more than 30 years, estimates that 90% of the newlyweds she talked to on her Hawaiian vacation last year — and there were a lot — said they met online.  There's the Match.com girl you dated three times and have no interest in seeing again. There's the guy who keeps e-mailing you long after he should have given up. What's the etiquette for ending these nontraditional arrangements? Do three dates with someone you met online obligate you to a breakup phone call? Or is e-mail enough?  Lynn Harris, co-founder of Breakup Girl, believes that "the only time it's OK to break up by text message is if the entire relationship consisted of text messaging. That goes for e-mail, too." 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Next Gen Weighs a ‘Secure’ Future

Posted on April 23, 2005

Wired_news  WIRED — Apr 18 — At the Computers, Freedom and Privacy conference in Seattle last week five teenagers with a sophisticated grasp of civil liberties and First Amendment rights took the stage; moderated by Danah Boyd and Kevin Bankston, a lawyer with the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Boyd: Do any of you or your peers use text messaging, and if so why?
Morgan: Well, a lot of my friends use text messaging so that they can (communicate) in class without getting caught. They become experts at sitting there looking like they're reading books, but they're really punching in their text message to their friends. And what really pisses me off … is they use it during tests to transfer answers.

Boyd: I know that some of your friends and you use (blogging). So why did your friends start using it and what do they use it for?  Morgan: If you've got something that's bothering you, you can just rant about it (on a blog) and get it off your chest without actually doing something that you might regret later.  Elisabeth: My parents got divorced this year. It's kind of rough. I can just tell my friends something (on my blog) that was going on without having to do this whole sob thing (in person).  Steve: It's a safety valve for a lot of teenagers, just to keep them from blowing their tops. Max: It's a great way to understand what everyone thinks about (a) teacher.

Boyd: Another argument against teenage blogging is that it exposes you to the ever-present sexual predators. Does this stop anyone you know from participating?   Steve: My cousin chatted with someone she thought was a 13-year-old girl for about two years and ended up almost being kidnapped by a 30-year-old stalker…. So I think you need to be careful with it, but I think if you use common sense it's perfectly safe. Elisabeth: I remember the first day I posted my (profile on) MySpace. I got this message from some guy who's like, "You're cute. Do you have a webcam? Why don't we talk on AIM, here's my (AIM address)." I was like, "Yeah, OK" (speaking sarcastically). I mean, you don't talk to people you don't know. It's common sense.  Steve: You don't actually have to be yourself (on a blog). You can put up completely false information and you can still blog with your friends. People you trust know that it's really you, the other people don't.  Steve: Actually, most of the people put up real information.
Morgan: Yeah, a lot of people put up information I wouldn't put up if I were them.

Boyd: How popular is file-sharing amongst your community and how has it changed over time?  Elisabeth: It's really popular. I know I use it but not very much. I know all my friends use it. I don't want to pay $18 for a CD when I can download songs or burn a CD from all my friends.  Morgan: I think that it's actually decreased in recent years…. You're more likely to get your music from your friends than from anybody else. I know that lots of times when I go over to LAN parties or something I'll look at other people's music … and I'll throw their files onto my computer. It's faster than file sharing, it's easier, and it's not as illegal. (Audience laughs nervously.)

Boyd:
Schools have been interested in implementing filtering systems that purport to block pornography and other offensive material. Do any of your schools do this?  Morgan: My school … used to filter only some stuff, now it's filtering more…. I'm actually opposed to all forms of filtering. People need to make their own decisions. Schools should not be making moral decisions for their students.  Bankston: Adults justify this filtering because they feel the material is harmful to minors. Do you buy that?  Morgan: Partially yes, because I do know people who have had pornography addictions in third grade. But on the other hand, it's really not the job of the school to stop that from happening. The parents need to teach their kids not to do that. Elisabeth: I don't think that porn is a very good thing to have on the internet, but I don't think that that kind of stuff should be allowed on the internet (at all) if it's so bad for us. Steve: I find it quite absurd that they would filter based on swear words. Honestly, I hear more swear words in school than from anywhere else.

Steve: Every kid at whatever age gets "the talk" from their parents about sex. So why don't they have a one-on-one mature conversation with their kids about privacy on the internet as well?  Morgan: Parents really need to talk to their kids more. A lot of times (my parents) don't really talk to me about anything, they just expect me to know it. If parents want their kids to act mature, if they want their kids to care about certain things, they need to explain to their kids why they should care. 

Mark Brooks: Great insight.  Check out Danah's papers, 'Friendster and Publicly Articulated Social Networks' 'Social Network Fragments' 'Sexing the Internet'

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Keeping Online Daters Honest

Posted on April 4, 2005

TruedaterWIRED — Apr 1 — TrueDater, not to be confused with True.com, is a database of reviews written by people who met through online personals. The goal here is not to rate (or berate) the person, but to compare how he or she matched the profile that got your attention. Does she look like her pictures? Is he really 6 feet tall?  Currently, you can read and submit reviews for members of Match.com, JDate and AmericanSingles.com. To post a review, you indicate which dating site they belong to and enter their profile ID. Rate them with a "yes" (they tell the truth in their profiles) or a "no," and add a few words of explanation. 

The full article was originally published at Wired, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: Why do they limit to Match and Spark I wonder?

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Beyond the Dating Database

Posted on March 14, 2005

WIRED — Mar 11 — These days, if you're single and have internet access, you're about as likely to have an online personal as not.  Not long ago I read a series of articles about how membership in online dating sites was leveling off.  Of course it is!  If a matchmaking site is any good, it stands to reason that people would pair off and cancel their memberships.  The lines between meeting online and meeting offline grow fuzzy. Ask me where I met my boyfriend and I'll tell you online, on a motorcycle listserv. Ask him, and he'll say offline, at a party thrown by another member of the list.  The internet has become as ordinary as any church group, running club or singles hangout when it comes to meeting a special someone or two. 

The full article was originally published at Wired, but is no longer available.

Mark Brooks: So now we've hit mainstream, what's next?  Social networking?  Mobile dating?

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • YouTube
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
Graphic featuring the logo of Courtland Brooks with the text 'We'll Help You Grow, Thrive & Exit' and bullet points for services including Strategy, Marketing, PR, Influencers, and Business Development.

OUR EVENTS

A blurred audience in a large venue with colorful lighting, featuring the bold text 'LTR US' in the foreground.

OUR SPONSORS

Logo of HubPeople featuring geometric shapes and the text 'HubPeople' in a modern font.
Logo of LeadThink, featuring the tagline 'YOUR GROWTH STARTS WITH US' and the description 'The #1 Destination for Early to Late-Stage Startups' in a combination of blue and pink text.

GOT NEWS?

Share your news at
tips@onlinepersonalswatch.com.

COURTLAND BROOKS

We help online dating & social businesses grow, thrive, and exit. See CourtlandBrooks.com.

CONTACT

Mark Brooks
CEO, Courtland Brooks
Publisher, Online Personals Watch
mark@courtlandbrooks.com

Irena Brooks
Editor, Online Personals Watch
irena@courtlandbrooks.com

©2025 Online Personals Watch