Online Personals Watch
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • News by Company & Categories
    • News by Date
    • All Online Dating Statistics
    • Public Companies
    • Acquisitions
    • Funding Rounds
    • Top Online Dating Reporters
    • OPW in the Press
    • All Executive Interviews
  • Conferences
  • Courtland Brooks
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
Menu

Category: PerfectMatch

Playing With Matches

Posted on February 23, 2007

UserlenlyleonardoDAILY PRESS — Feb 22 –I'd like to see a law pass endorsing arranged marriages. In the meantime, I'll study the personal ads. I've bookmarked online dating sites like eHarmony and Perfect Match. Singles begin their adventure by filling in a few blanks. This brings them a handful of leads with names like "Goodtime Gertie." To view a more refined assortment, they must fork over some cash. But here's an exception: PlentyofFish.com is free.

Mark Brooks: I'm working on a study of the success story sections of the top 30 dating properties. JDate is strong with 195 complete with pictures.   

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Perfect Match CEO, Duane Dahl – OPW Interview

Posted on February 16, 2007

PerfectmatchOPW INTERVIEW — Feb 16, 2007 — To join eHarmony users have to take the personality profiling test. All 436 questions. Only one other (top 20) dating site makes all new members take a personality profile -  PerfectMatch. Here's my interview with Duane Dahl, the CEO. I also interviewed Duane in June 2005. – Mark Brooks

I was floored when I saw Dr. Phil with Perfectmatch.
Last year after Perfectmatch was featured on Dr. Phil, it gave us a unique opportunity to develop our relationship with the Dr. Phil people, and spend some time getting to know them. We were interested in pursuing a partnership arrangement, however, at the end of the day, it didn’t pencil out. Eventually, the Match folks constructed a lucrative deal for him – I’m not sure how that’s penciling out for them at this point.

What new TV and movie placements do you have in the works?
We’re always looking for significant seamless integration in TV and film. It’s an ongoing process. We’re in development on a prime time series we’re very excited about. On the film side, we have a couple of projects, one late summer, and one in the fall that we’ll be announcing shortly. Additionally, we’ve got some ideas for 2007 regarding developing creative partnerships. We had great success with Whirlpool in 2006, with a series of events. Currently, we’re working with the Case Foundation (Steve and Jean Case) participating in a “Get Engaged” volunteer program we’re promoting in February.

Why do you like these placements better then Internet advertising?
I wouldn’t say we like them better. We certainly think there’s a significant value in performance-based online partnerships and well placed online media. Add that to the search mix, our keyword business with the Google folks and Overture, and we like the blend online. It’s an important part of our business.

When we first started looking at television opportunities, we were really trying to be creative and gain as many impressions as possible. We were on a very limited budget, as we were rolling out the site. And, as we experienced with the Lifetime original movie “Perfect Romance” and then the Warner Bros. summer hit, “Must Love Dogs”, the right opportunities with seamless integration can be fantastic. The key with the entertainment integration opportunities is just to be selective and make sure there’s a perfect match.  We feel fortunate we’ve had some great studio partners and noted success.

Have you searched out any newspaper deals?
No, that hasn’t been our focus. We’ve really focused on larger scale online partners, keywords and now television. 

eHarmony said it would never offer instant messaging a while back. Would Perfectmatch ever offer IM?We currently don’t offer instant messaging, but I would never, say never. It’s evaluated on an ongoing basis. We’ve found our membership has embraced the communication system currently in place. We routinely survey our membership to ensure we’re meeting their needs and we continue to provide the best approach to finding a mate online. Our search feature, which of course eHarmony hasn’t cracked, and our communication tools are constantly reviewed.

How about voice and video communications?
I think video is very difficult at this stage. We’ve seen a few people attempt to launch video. Live video gravitates towards sexually explicit material. This medium is something geared for those who’re interested in a quick hook up, and more deviant behavior seems to gravitate towards live video. I would expect to see video more on the younger skewing down-market dating sites rather than the more credible 25+ sites where the members are looking for relationships. There’re a lot of issues with video that are challenging to the consumer. Also, if you’re allowing an individual to upload video, it’s incumbent upon the community to review every second of the video content before approving it onto the site, as people (shockingly enough!) will upload videos that contain inappropriate content. There’s nothing worse on a dating/relationship site to not know what is behind door #3 and being presented with an inappropriate image, video or an email from a spammer. As the Internet and media evolves, we’ll see an appropriate integration. However, I do think it’s going to take some time.

Do you think voice connections can be successful through Internet dating sites?
I think with today’s technology, the ability to simply connect with an individual through voice is something that does have value. It’s only a matter of making it as seamless as possible. We looked at a secure phone service back in 2001. One of the challenges was requiring individuals who had already gone through the sign up process, to go and create completely new accounts. It just needed seamlessly integrating onto one platform. We’ve come a long way here over the past five years, and I think as time goes on, we’ll see more and more people successfully integrating the voice technology that’s available.

How else is Perfectmatch clearly differentiated from eHarmony?
Most online daters haven’t been satisfied in the past. By the time the member comes to Perfectmatch, we recognize they’re serious about finding a relationship. Our approach is significantly different as we offer both highly compatible matches provided AND comprehensive search capabilities. We’re a step above eHarmony with our in-depth member profiles AND our member services team, the most experienced team in the space. This team works behind the scenes proactively dedicating themselves to ensuring the best possible user experience, from log-on though log-out.

Our members leverage the real world experience and expertise of Dr. Pepper Schwartz and benefit from our matching system, Duet®, allowing us to take into account the “whole” member, a 360◦ view of the member, helping us to find a highly compatible match.  We believe the black box approach eHarmony has taken is difficult. However, give them credit – they’ve done a great job ramping up their business through a very aggressive TV spend. We expect to see them loosening the reigns a bit in 2007/2008, continuing to move away from its Christian origins, as they attempt to become more mainstream and more efficient with their member acquisition strategies.

At the end of the day, when faced with the offerings of Perfectmatch vs. eHarmony, we’ve seen members believe we have the best approach to finding real love online.

What are your goals for the year?
You’ll find us working offline more aggressively – both television and radio. We think there continues to be an excellent opportunity with television. In fact, we’re rolling out a new spot within the next two weeks. Online, we’ll continue to work to become more efficient with search, and we look to expand our relationship with our existing partners MSNBC, iVillage and Oxygen, while solidifying a couple of other key performance based partnerships.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Perfect Match CEO, Duane Dahl – OPW Interview

Posted on February 16, 2007

PerfectmatchOPW INTERVIEW — Feb 16, 2007 — To join eHarmony users have to take the personality profiling test. All 436 questions. Only one other (top 20) dating site makes all new members take a personality profile -  PerfectMatch. Here's my interview with Duane Dahl, the CEO. I also interviewed Duane in June 2005. – Mark Brooks

I was floored when I saw Dr. Phil with Perfectmatch.
Last year after Perfectmatch was featured on Dr. Phil, it gave us a unique opportunity to develop our relationship with the Dr. Phil people, and spend some time getting to know them. We were interested in pursuing a partnership arrangement, however, at the end of the day, it didn’t pencil out. Eventually, the Match folks constructed a lucrative deal for him – I’m not sure how that’s penciling out for them at this point.

What new TV and movie placements do you have in the works?
We’re always looking for significant seamless integration in TV and film. It’s an ongoing process. We’re in development on a prime time series we’re very excited about. On the film side, we have a couple of projects, one late summer, and one in the fall that we’ll be announcing shortly. Additionally, we’ve got some ideas for 2007 regarding developing creative partnerships. We had great success with Whirlpool in 2006, with a series of events. Currently, we’re working with the Case Foundation (Steve and Jean Case) participating in a “Get Engaged” volunteer program we’re promoting in February.

Why do you like these placements better then Internet advertising?
I wouldn’t say we like them better. We certainly think there’s a significant value in performance-based online partnerships and well placed online media. Add that to the search mix, our keyword business with the Google folks and Overture, and we like the blend online. It’s an important part of our business.

When we first started looking at television opportunities, we were really trying to be creative and gain as many impressions as possible. We were on a very limited budget, as we were rolling out the site. And, as we experienced with the Lifetime original movie “Perfect Romance” and then the Warner Bros. summer hit, “Must Love Dogs”, the right opportunities with seamless integration can be fantastic. The key with the entertainment integration opportunities is just to be selective and make sure there’s a perfect match.  We feel fortunate we’ve had some great studio partners and noted success.

Have you searched out any newspaper deals?
No, that hasn’t been our focus. We’ve really focused on larger scale online partners, keywords and now television. 

eHarmony said it would never offer instant messaging a while back. Would Perfectmatch ever offer IM?We currently don’t offer instant messaging, but I would never, say never. It’s evaluated on an ongoing basis. We’ve found our membership has embraced the communication system currently in place. We routinely survey our membership to ensure we’re meeting their needs and we continue to provide the best approach to finding a mate online. Our search feature, which of course eHarmony hasn’t cracked, and our communication tools are constantly reviewed.

How about voice and video communications?
I think video is very difficult at this stage. We’ve seen a few people attempt to launch video. Live video gravitates towards sexually explicit material. This medium is something geared for those who’re interested in a quick hook up, and more deviant behavior seems to gravitate towards live video. I would expect to see video more on the younger skewing down-market dating sites rather than the more credible 25+ sites where the members are looking for relationships. There’re a lot of issues with video that are challenging to the consumer. Also, if you’re allowing an individual to upload video, it’s incumbent upon the community to review every second of the video content before approving it onto the site, as people (shockingly enough!) will upload videos that contain inappropriate content. There’s nothing worse on a dating/relationship site to not know what is behind door #3 and being presented with an inappropriate image, video or an email from a spammer. As the Internet and media evolves, we’ll see an appropriate integration. However, I do think it’s going to take some time.

Do you think voice connections can be successful through Internet dating sites?
I think with today’s technology, the ability to simply connect with an individual through voice is something that does have value. It’s only a matter of making it as seamless as possible. We looked at a secure phone service back in 2001. One of the challenges was requiring individuals who had already gone through the sign up process, to go and create completely new accounts. It just needed seamlessly integrating onto one platform. We’ve come a long way here over the past five years, and I think as time goes on, we’ll see more and more people successfully integrating the voice technology that’s available.

How else is Perfectmatch clearly differentiated from eHarmony?
Most online daters haven’t been satisfied in the past. By the time the member comes to Perfectmatch, we recognize they’re serious about finding a relationship. Our approach is significantly different as we offer both highly compatible matches provided AND comprehensive search capabilities. We’re a step above eHarmony with our in-depth member profiles AND our member services team, the most experienced team in the space. This team works behind the scenes proactively dedicating themselves to ensuring the best possible user experience, from log-on though log-out.

Our members leverage the real world experience and expertise of Dr. Pepper Schwartz and benefit from our matching system, Duet®, allowing us to take into account the “whole” member, a 360◦ view of the member, helping us to find a highly compatible match.  We believe the black box approach eHarmony has taken is difficult. However, give them credit – they’ve done a great job ramping up their business through a very aggressive TV spend. We expect to see them loosening the reigns a bit in 2007/2008, continuing to move away from its Christian origins, as they attempt to become more mainstream and more efficient with their member acquisition strategies.

At the end of the day, when faced with the offerings of Perfectmatch vs. eHarmony, we’ve seen members believe we have the best approach to finding real love online.

What are your goals for the year?
You’ll find us working offline more aggressively – both television and radio. We think there continues to be an excellent opportunity with television. In fact, we’re rolling out a new spot within the next two weeks. Online, we’ll continue to work to become more efficient with search, and we look to expand our relationship with our existing partners MSNBC, iVillage and Oxygen, while solidifying a couple of other key performance based partnerships.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Which Dating Sites Convert the Best?

Posted on January 3, 2007

OPW — Jan 2 — Online Personals Watch is for online personals marketing managers and executives to stay ahead of the news, and for the press to research the industry. It's not really designed for end users. Having said that, I make a few bucks from affiliate text links. $5k last year. Not too shabby. I thought I'd share the conversion numbers with you, for open discussion. I'm listing companies with which I had more than 1000 click throughs. I'm told affiliates will usually send an affiliate program 300 clicks before drawing initial conclusions on conversions. Here's the rankings drawn from stats for January 1st 2005, through December 25th 2006.  I'll redo them for a smaller date range later this quarter. 

 

 
Dating site Affiliate System Total Commission Total Uniques Income per Unique
#1 PerfectMatch Commission Junction   $899 2567    35c
#2 SexSearch In House   $1,580 4690    34c
#3 TRUE Commission Junction*   $1,459 5626    26c
#4 AdultFriendFinder In House   $1,523 6144    25c
#5 Yahoo Personals Commission Junction   $1,595 6780    24c
#6 eHarmony Commission Junction   $502 3536    14.2c
#7 American Singles Commission Junction   $285 3591    7.9c
#8 Match Link Share**   $503 4887    7.7c
#9 Cupid Direct Track   $210 3334    5c
#10 Joint: Webdate
and Love Access
Both In House   $0 2923/1916    0c

  * I switched out to TRUE under Primaryads.com and they are paying out a little better.
** I've not had a good experience with LinkShare.

All the sites pay out slightly differently.  Where I had an option, I opted to be paid by % of revenue generated. I've focused on Dollars per Unique for this comparison.  If you want the full spreadsheet, email me at mark@onlinepersonalswatch.com and I'll send you the stats including the number of registrants, paying members, revenue and additional ratios. Your comments please…

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Which Dating Sites Convert the Best?

Posted on January 3, 2007

OPW — Jan 2 — Online Personals Watch is for online personals marketing managers and executives to stay ahead of the news, and for the press to research the industry. It's not really designed for end users. Having said that, I make a few bucks from affiliate text links. $5k last year. Not too shabby. I thought I'd share the conversion numbers with you, for open discussion. I'm listing companies with which I had more than 1000 click throughs. I'm told affiliates will usually send an affiliate program 300 clicks before drawing initial conclusions on conversions. Here's the rankings drawn from stats for January 1st 2005, through December 25th 2006.  I'll redo them for a smaller date range later this quarter. 

 

 
Dating site Affiliate System Total Commission Total Uniques Income per Unique
#1 PerfectMatch Commission Junction   $899 2567    35c
#2 SexSearch In House   $1,580 4690    34c
#3 TRUE Commission Junction*   $1,459 5626    26c
#4 AdultFriendFinder In House   $1,523 6144    25c
#5 Yahoo Personals Commission Junction   $1,595 6780    24c
#6 eHarmony Commission Junction   $502 3536    14.2c
#7 American Singles Commission Junction   $285 3591    7.9c
#8 Match Link Share**   $503 4887    7.7c
#9 Cupid Direct Track   $210 3334    5c
#10 Joint: Webdate
and Love Access
Both In House   $0 2923/1916    0c

  * I switched out to TRUE under Primaryads.com and they are paying out a little better.
** I've not had a good experience with LinkShare.

All the sites pay out slightly differently.  Where I had an option, I opted to be paid by % of revenue generated. I've focused on Dollars per Unique for this comparison.  If you want the full spreadsheet, email me at mark@onlinepersonalswatch.com and I'll send you the stats including the number of registrants, paying members, revenue and additional ratios. Your comments please…

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Online Personals Newspaper Partnerships

Posted on September 9, 2006

Graph_1RATE OR DATE — Sep 6 — Take a look at this Alexa graph of two sites going in different directions, plentyoffish.com vs. americansingles.com.

Unlike many industries, where market share is a costly trophy for top executives, here, share and momentum are about survival. In a recent report by Kelsey (Newspapers Should Bolster Online Alliances) senior analyst Michael Boland says, "Partnering with online players to etch out a strategy is something that we've seen work, and we  recommend that partnering with an online player is a good move." The report goes on to state that newspapers need to re-think their emphasis on offline conversions, when new technologies offer more potential for online conversions.  Here's a list of U.S.newspapers.
 

Dating Site/Network Paper Partners,
Weighted Total
eharmony.com 18.33
perfectmatch.com 14
people2people.com 13.5
fastcupid.com 7
match.com 4
americansingles.com 3.33
relationshipexchange.com 2
ahsventures.com 2
yahoopersonals.com 1
relationshipnetwork.com 1
heart2heartnetwork.com 1
900 number 1
jdate.com 0.33
n/a 31.5
SUM 100

 

Dating Site/Network Top 3 Partners,
by circulation
eharmony.com usatoday.com
latimes.com
chicgaotribune.com
people2people.com washingtonpost.com
stltoday.com
tampabay.com
perfectmatch.com philly.com
miami.com
kansascity.com
fastcupid.com sfgate.com
seattletimes.com
signonsandiego.com
match.com dallasnews.com
pe.com
fresnobee.com
americansingles.com latimes.com
chicgaotribune.com
newsday.com
relationshipexchange.com denverpost.com
buffalonews.com
ahsventures.com chron.com
mysanantonio.com
900 number nytimes.com
yahoopersonals.com boston.com
relationshipnetwork.com mcall.com
heart2heartnetwork.com jacksonville.com
jdate.com sun-sentinal.com

Almost 1/3 of newspapers have no online-personals partner. Partnerships at the parent-company-level were not as coherent as one might expect. Only Gannett stands out for their unwavering faithfulness to eHarmony, a partnership that spans over a dozen papers in the Top 100 list. Compare that to The McClatchy Company, who is primary linked with PerfectMatch, but whose portfolio companies also appear to include one-off deals with eharmony.com, match.com and americansingles.com. But at least those companies are in the game, which is more than one can say for Advance Publication. Despite having four papers in the U.S. Top 100 list (cleveland.com, nj.com, mlive.com, al.com), no online-dating partners could be found on any of their sites.

Best Integration – Boston.com / Yahoo! Personals – Yahoo provides several content sections, Boston.com has their own Personals forum, and Boston.com Personals has even held their own events and contests.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Lifetime Series to Mention Perfectmatch

Posted on June 2, 2006

Perfectmatch_5MBP — June 2 — Perfectmatch (3 million members) signed a season-long deal to be integrated into the storyline of Lifetime channel's new series about a dysfunctional dating service. Perfectmatch will appear as a faceless nemesis that steals clients from Lovespring. Perfectmatch (also mentioned in "Must Love Dogs" and "Failure to Launch") will be integrated into the June films "The Break-Up," with Jennifer Aniston and Vince Vaughn, and "Superman Returns," starring Kate Bosworth and Kevin Spacey.  

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Ultimate List of Dating Industry Jobs

Posted on May 4, 2006

May 4 — I'm rolling the list of internet dating, social networking and business networking industry jobs links into a handy little list.  Please let me know if you have any new links for the list by emailing me at mark@onlinepersonalswatch.com.  Thanks.  – Mark

CommunityConnect
Cupid
Friendfinder
Friendster
Hi5
Lavalife
Match
Mate1
Meetup
MySpace
PerfectMatch
PlanetOut/Gay
Shaadi
Spark Networks
Webdate
Yahoo Personals

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Perfectmatch.com Launches Duet(R) Analysis

Posted on April 25, 2006

Perfectmatchcom_6PR NEWSWIRE — Apr 24 — Perfectmatch.com announced their new Duet(R) Analysis Profile with additional emphasis on personality and lifestyle.  Perfectmatch.com appears in "Failure to Launch" with Matthew McConaughey and Sarah Jessica Parker, and in "Superman Returns," in theatres June 30th.  RELEASE @ SYS-CON

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Computing the Mysteries of Attraction

Posted on March 31, 2006

Perfectmatchcom_4NY TIMES — Mar 29 — Students Elizabeth and Robert were at Wesleyan in 1965 when they became a part of what might have been the first computer dating service; Operation Match.  It sent questionnaires to college campuses, students rated their own looks, intelligence and interests, described their ideal date using the same measures, then returned the survey, along with a $3 fee.  Responses were transferred to punch cards and fed into an enormous Avco 1790 computer. Six weeks later, it spat out lists of mates for everyone. …During the first five years of marriage, the divorce rate for a couple of the same religion is 24%, no matter what that religion is. But it jumps to 38% for a Protestant and a Catholic, and 42% for a Jew and a Christian, according to economist Evelyn Lehrer.  Divorce rates are higher for interracial couples and couples with a wife who is 4+ years older than her husband. (When the man is a lot older, on the other hand, divorce is no more likely than when spouses are about the same age.)  Personality profiling atempts to "…narrow it down so you spend less time with people who are totally out of the question," said Pepper Schwartz, PerfectMatch's sociologist.  FULL ARTICLE @ NY TIMES

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Previous
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • Next
  • YouTube
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
Graphic featuring the logo of Courtland Brooks with the text 'We'll Help You Grow, Thrive & Exit' and bullet points for services including Strategy, Marketing, PR, Influencers, and Business Development.

OUR EVENTS

A blurred audience in a large venue with colorful lighting, featuring the bold text 'LTR US' in the foreground.

OUR SPONSORS

Logo of HubPeople featuring geometric shapes and the text 'HubPeople' in a modern font.
Logo of LeadThink, featuring the tagline 'YOUR GROWTH STARTS WITH US' and the description 'The #1 Destination for Early to Late-Stage Startups' in a combination of blue and pink text.

GOT NEWS?

Share your news at
tips@onlinepersonalswatch.com.

COURTLAND BROOKS

We help online dating & social businesses grow, thrive, and exit. See CourtlandBrooks.com.

CONTACT

Mark Brooks
CEO, Courtland Brooks
Publisher, Online Personals Watch
mark@courtlandbrooks.com

Irena Brooks
Editor, Online Personals Watch
irena@courtlandbrooks.com

©2025 Online Personals Watch