ASSOCIATED PRESS– Nov 7 — A Manhattan judge ruled one woman was to be refunded the $1,000 she had paid for a six-month membership to Great Expectations after she met no one through the service. The judge awarded the other woman the $3,790 she paid for a 54-month deal. The judge found that "there was a massive overcharge by the dating service" and that Great Expectations' contract "violated every mandate of the Dating Services Law" except for the three-day "cooling off" right to cancel. The dating service will appeal, spokesman Bob Liff said Monday.
NYC Women Refunded by Great Expectations
ASSOCIATED PRESS– Nov 7 — A Manhattan judge ruled one woman was to be refunded the $1,000 she had paid for a six-month membership to Great Expectations after she met no one through the service. The judge awarded the other woman the $3,790 she paid for a 54-month deal. The judge found that "there was a massive overcharge by the dating service" and that Great Expectations' contract "violated every mandate of the Dating Services Law" except for the three-day "cooling off" right to cancel. The dating service will appeal, spokesman Bob Liff said Monday.
