Online Personals Watch
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • News by Company & Categories
    • News by Date
    • All Online Dating Statistics
    • Public Companies
    • Acquisitions
    • Funding Rounds
    • Top Online Dating Reporters
    • OPW in the Press
    • All Executive Interviews
  • Conferences
  • Courtland Brooks
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
Menu

Month: April 2007

Romantic Revulsion in the New Century: Flaw-O-Matic 2.0

Posted on April 11, 2007

NY TIMES — Apr 10 — Scientists can now watch mating rituals in real time (thanks to online dating). They've analyzed the courtship choices of more than 10,000 speed-daters. Researchers found that women are pickier than men. Men concentrate mainly on looks and will ask out a lot of women as long as they're above a certain threshold of attractiveness. Women focus on fewer prospects and are less willing to date someone of another race When using online services women pay more attention than men do to a potential partner's education, profession and income. They prefer taller men, but they're willing to relax their standards. A study of 20,000 online daters by Gunter Hitsch and Ali Hortacsu of the University of Chicago and Dan Ariely of MIT, found that a 5'8" man was just as successful in getting dates as a 6-footer if he made more money – precisely $146k a year more. For a 5'2" man, the number was $277k. [see nytimes.com/tierneylab.] "When you have all these criteria to consider, and so many people to choose from, you start striving for perfection," Dr. Ariely says. "You don't want to settle."  It's the same problem afflicting New Yorkers: with so many prospects in the big city, they refuse to stop searching. Online daters typically end up going out with fewer than 1 percent of the people whose profiles they study online. The average speed-dating participant makes a match with at least 1 in 10 of the people they meet. FULL ARTICLE @ NY TIMES

Mark Brooks: Email me at mark@onlinepersonalswatch.com or call me at 212-444-1636 if you'd like to open your site up to academics for this kind of research.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Romantic Revulsion in the New Century: Flaw-O-Matic 2.0

Posted on April 11, 2007

NY TIMES — Apr 10 — Scientists can now watch mating rituals in real time (thanks to online dating). They've analyzed the courtship choices of more than 10,000 speed-daters. Researchers found that women are pickier than men. Men concentrate mainly on looks and will ask out a lot of women as long as they're above a certain threshold of attractiveness. Women focus on fewer prospects and are less willing to date someone of another race When using online services women pay more attention than men do to a potential partner's education, profession and income. They prefer taller men, but they're willing to relax their standards. A study of 20,000 online daters by Gunter Hitsch and Ali Hortacsu of the University of Chicago and Dan Ariely of MIT, found that a 5'8" man was just as successful in getting dates as a 6-footer if he made more money – precisely $146k a year more. For a 5'2" man, the number was $277k. [see nytimes.com/tierneylab.] "When you have all these criteria to consider, and so many people to choose from, you start striving for perfection," Dr. Ariely says. "You don't want to settle."  It's the same problem afflicting New Yorkers: with so many prospects in the big city, they refuse to stop searching. Online daters typically end up going out with fewer than 1 percent of the people whose profiles they study online. The average speed-dating participant makes a match with at least 1 in 10 of the people they meet. FULL ARTICLE @ NY TIMES

Mark Brooks: Email me at mark@onlinepersonalswatch.com or call me at 212-444-1636 if you'd like to open your site up to academics for this kind of research.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Finding Silver in the Silver Singles Set

Posted on April 11, 2007

Senior_dating MEDIA LIFE MAGAZINE — Increasingly dating sites report a surge in silver singles, 50-plus. Indeed, they say it’s now their fastest-growing demographic and the most lucrative. “Fifty-plus daters generate more subscriptions than younger daters, and they are more likely to subscribe for a longer period of time,” says Maida Goodman, spokesperson for Match.com, where 23% of subscribers are over 50, more than double the number two years ago. A survey last year by AARP found that 70% of single baby boomers said they dated regularly (on or offline). At TRUE, the 50-plus set membership is up 178% in 2006 and accounts for almost 10% of membership. Nielsen//NetRatings show 54% of the people who went to MSN Dating & Personals (powered by Match.com) in the month of February were 45+ years old.

Site                        Unique Audience Composition (%)    Unique Audience (000)
TRUE                                         44,76                                    1,367
American Singles                        43.83                                       706
Match.com                                 43.32                                    1,871
Yahoo Personals                         41.46                                    2,238
MSN Dating & Personals               39.7                                      1,097
eHarmony                                  38.74                                      577
Mate1.com                                 35.25                                      641

Nielsen//NetRatings

The full article was originally published at Life Media Magazine, but is no longer available.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Finding Silver in the Silver Singles Set

Posted on April 11, 2007

Senior_dating MEDIA LIFE MAGAZINE — Increasingly dating sites report a surge in silver singles, 50-plus. Indeed, they say it’s now their fastest-growing demographic and the most lucrative. “Fifty-plus daters generate more subscriptions than younger daters, and they are more likely to subscribe for a longer period of time,” says Maida Goodman, spokesperson for Match.com, where 23% of subscribers are over 50, more than double the number two years ago. A survey last year by AARP found that 70% of single baby boomers said they dated regularly (on or offline). At TRUE, the 50-plus set membership is up 178% in 2006 and accounts for almost 10% of membership. Nielsen//NetRatings show 54% of the people who went to MSN Dating & Personals (powered by Match.com) in the month of February were 45+ years old.

Site                        Unique Audience Composition (%)    Unique Audience (000)
TRUE                                         44,76                                    1,367
American Singles                        43.83                                       706
Match.com                                 43.32                                    1,871
Yahoo Personals                         41.46                                    2,238
MSN Dating & Personals               39.7                                      1,097
eHarmony                                  38.74                                      577
Mate1.com                                 35.25                                      641

Nielsen//NetRatings

The full article was originally published at Life Media Magazine, but is no longer available.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Engage.com Connects Daters with Matchmakers

Posted on April 9, 2007

EngageMERCURY NEWS — Apr 9 — Engage.com (free, 200k members) is founded on the premise that online dating needs to be more like offline dating. Members are encouraged to seek out matchmakers who have volunteered to act as yentas…and invite friends to join and to vouch for them. The site's old-fashioned approach to courtship is one answer to the disappointment reported by online daters. A 2005 JupiterResearch survey found one in three online daters as "somewhat satisfied." Mark Brooks, editor of Onlinepersonalswatch.com and an Internet dating consultant, said Engage addresses one weakness of the most popular dating sites, the ability to involve one's friends in a budding romance. Brooks said the chance of hooking up with a friend of a friend is one of the keys to the success of social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook. People can avoid the awkwardness of actually declaring they are single, but don't want to be. "I love what they are doing, but it's going to take them awhile to be successful," Brooks said. Some of Engage's features are specifically designed to turn off would-be "players" who populate other sites. For example, Engage encourages its members to rate one another on "responsiveness," "politeness" and whether a person is "true" to his or her profile. Mike Murrow has been chronicling his online dating misadventures and said Engage's matchmaker process sounded good but required friends who were extremely committed. "My friends have their own lives; they are not going to scan through the profiles." FULL ARTICLE @ MERCURY NEWS

Mark Brooks: I think the industry is doing a better job of setting expectations these days. Online dating takes time. The matchmaking industry is doing well because many people don't want to spend time. They just want dates, and they'll pay for them. There's an opportunity in there somewhere. 😉 The clever people at Match are working to meld the yenta and online dating worlds together, but I think it will be a little tougher than they think. I think Match will need to offer a money back guarantee to safeguard their brand, and encourage word-of-mouth, and compete with $3000+ services like Great Expectations, Together Dating/The Right One, and Table For Six.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Engage.com Connects Daters with Matchmakers

Posted on April 9, 2007

EngageMERCURY NEWS — Apr 9 — Engage.com (free, 200k members) is founded on the premise that online dating needs to be more like offline dating. Members are encouraged to seek out matchmakers who have volunteered to act as yentas…and invite friends to join and to vouch for them. The site's old-fashioned approach to courtship is one answer to the disappointment reported by online daters. A 2005 JupiterResearch survey found one in three online daters as "somewhat satisfied." Mark Brooks, editor of Onlinepersonalswatch.com and an Internet dating consultant, said Engage addresses one weakness of the most popular dating sites, the ability to involve one's friends in a budding romance. Brooks said the chance of hooking up with a friend of a friend is one of the keys to the success of social networking sites like MySpace or Facebook. People can avoid the awkwardness of actually declaring they are single, but don't want to be. "I love what they are doing, but it's going to take them awhile to be successful," Brooks said. Some of Engage's features are specifically designed to turn off would-be "players" who populate other sites. For example, Engage encourages its members to rate one another on "responsiveness," "politeness" and whether a person is "true" to his or her profile. Mike Murrow has been chronicling his online dating misadventures and said Engage's matchmaker process sounded good but required friends who were extremely committed. "My friends have their own lives; they are not going to scan through the profiles." FULL ARTICLE @ MERCURY NEWS

Mark Brooks: I think the industry is doing a better job of setting expectations these days. Online dating takes time. The matchmaking industry is doing well because many people don't want to spend time. They just want dates, and they'll pay for them. There's an opportunity in there somewhere. 😉 The clever people at Match are working to meld the yenta and online dating worlds together, but I think it will be a little tougher than they think. I think Match will need to offer a money back guarantee to safeguard their brand, and encourage word-of-mouth, and compete with $3000+ services like Great Expectations, Together Dating/The Right One, and Table For Six.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Jonathan Abrams Knows a Good Party

Posted on April 8, 2007

FriendsterPhoto Caption: In his Friendster days, Jonathan Abrams (right) worked closely with Mark Brooks (center) and Steve Kingsley-Jones.

SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE — Apr 7 — He co-owns a trendy bar in San Francisco and two restaurants…and founded Friendster, the site that kick-started the social networking phenomenon in 2003. Abrams is back at it with Socializr (Jonathan + two full time employees, $770k angel funding). Like MyPunchbowl and Renkoo, it is positioned as an alternative to Evite. While Evite limits users to its templates, on Socializr, they can personalize their invitations with music and videos. Instead of re-creating their profile, Socializr will find users' photos on Flickr, their profile on MySpace and the latest entries in their Xanga blog, putting them all on one page. Users can see their friends' party plans. "This is something I wanted to do at Friendster but I wasn't able to," Abrams said. "It's something Friendster still hasn't done." FULL ARTICLE @ SF GATE

Mark Brooks: I'm not really the bald guy. I'm on the left in this photo. Friendster was a victim of it's own success. Jonathan will be happy to take a more slow and steady (wins the race) approach this time around.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Jonathan Abrams Knows a Good Party

Posted on April 8, 2007

FriendsterPhoto Caption: In his Friendster days, Jonathan Abrams (right) worked closely with Mark Brooks (center) and Steve Kingsley-Jones.

SAN FRANCISCO CHRONICLE — Apr 7 — He co-owns a trendy bar in San Francisco and two restaurants…and founded Friendster, the site that kick-started the social networking phenomenon in 2003. Abrams is back at it with Socializr (Jonathan + two full time employees, $770k angel funding). Like MyPunchbowl and Renkoo, it is positioned as an alternative to Evite. While Evite limits users to its templates, on Socializr, they can personalize their invitations with music and videos. Instead of re-creating their profile, Socializr will find users' photos on Flickr, their profile on MySpace and the latest entries in their Xanga blog, putting them all on one page. Users can see their friends' party plans. "This is something I wanted to do at Friendster but I wasn't able to," Abrams said. "It's something Friendster still hasn't done." FULL ARTICLE @ SF GATE

Mark Brooks: I'm not really the bald guy. I'm on the left in this photo. Friendster was a victim of it's own success. Jonathan will be happy to take a more slow and steady (wins the race) approach this time around.

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Ziki SVP Business Development, Andre Taliercio – OPW Interview

Posted on April 7, 2007

AndretaliercioOPW INTERVIEW — Apr 7 — Social networks give browsers an idea of a persons reputation through testimonials and the people they are linked with. Truedater.com reports on daters. Dating sites have considered integrating reputation management tools, but how to? Ziki is one of my favorite reputation management services and might serve as inspiration. I interviewed the SVP Business Development Andre Taliercio. – Mark Brooks

How and why was Ziki started?
Ziki was started by Patrick Chassany in New York. Patrick started a domain buying company in the late 90’s and he realized that buying people’s names and registering them to protect them was the next step. So in 2000 he decided to start a business with this concept. This was how Ziki was formed. Then I joined the company in September 2006 and we decided to add the promotion aspect. Why? Because we believe the name and identity control is a strong concept, combined with self promotion, it brings a unique feature in social networking and it address a need for millions of people.

How does the service work? How does a user use Ziki at its best?
The best use of Ziki is for users who produce content because  Ziki allows them to really aggregate all they have in one place and be visible on major search engines and the Ziki community. Sign up, put a picture and some personal information in and then all the other profiles and blogs that they have will show immediately on their home page. Ziki will allow them to be in control of everything.

How do you compare with Claim ID?
Claim ID is really restricted to the control of identity. In our case not only is all the content you produce in one place, our objective is to really make this content visible and promote it. I believe Claim ID doesn’t do that. I don’t think they want to do that.

You’re allowing people to pay on a PPC basis to bubble up their name in search results, but why would somebody want to do that?
We pay for it. Right now we sponsor our members first and last name. Then their name will show like a paid ad on Google, Yahoo and MSN. We’re paying for it. We’re doing it to show how visible Ziki members can be. So that’s why it’s free. Some people would not pay for it because maybe they don’t feel the need or understand how it works. But if people just try it they will see. It only takes one hour to do the program. You sign up and someone just turns the switch on and you will see your name as an ad, a paid ad.

How are you making money?
We’re not, yet. We just started this in September and we’re introducing the interface allowing users to choose their own keywords. They can manage their own advertising campaigns. We make money by optimizing the campaigns on Google, Yahoo and MSN. Because of the optimization we can make money from it. Of course, it makes sense if we can multiply this two cents by many, many users. This none on our business models…

Are you reaching out for any particular partners?
So far we are trying to get as many members as we can to add interesting profiles, meaning, people with content. One day we would like to develop strong intra-communities, with some leaders who will generate content on specific topics. This the beauty of Ziki: it benefits you outside and inside the community.

What are your goals for 2007?
To increase the active membership base and the number of paying customers. That’s what we want to do. We want to be visible but we don’t want to grow too fast. We want to really listen to the members and see how they feel we should evolve.

Now by the end of 2007, let’s say the community grows nicely, the number of members has increased, then we can identify common areas in this community. What we strive to do one day is, for example, to create Ziki.jobs, and Ziki.tech, and many types of sub community. Instead of growing outside with no control, we’re trying to grow inside with quality profiles and have sub communities. Why is this important? By doing this, we create the identify of the community, it’s culture.  One of the objectives for us is to create a culture within Ziki. 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Ziki SVP Business Development, Andre Taliercio – OPW Interview

Posted on April 7, 2007

AndretaliercioOPW INTERVIEW — Apr 7 — Social networks give browsers an idea of a persons reputation through testimonials and the people they are linked with. Truedater.com reports on daters. Dating sites have considered integrating reputation management tools, but how to? Ziki is one of my favorite reputation management services and might serve as inspiration. I interviewed the SVP Business Development Andre Taliercio. – Mark Brooks

How and why was Ziki started?
Ziki was started by Patrick Chassany in New York. Patrick started a domain buying company in the late 90’s and he realized that buying people’s names and registering them to protect them was the next step. So in 2000 he decided to start a business with this concept. This was how Ziki was formed. Then I joined the company in September 2006 and we decided to add the promotion aspect. Why? Because we believe the name and identity control is a strong concept, combined with self promotion, it brings a unique feature in social networking and it address a need for millions of people.

How does the service work? How does a user use Ziki at its best?
The best use of Ziki is for users who produce content because  Ziki allows them to really aggregate all they have in one place and be visible on major search engines and the Ziki community. Sign up, put a picture and some personal information in and then all the other profiles and blogs that they have will show immediately on their home page. Ziki will allow them to be in control of everything.

How do you compare with Claim ID?
Claim ID is really restricted to the control of identity. In our case not only is all the content you produce in one place, our objective is to really make this content visible and promote it. I believe Claim ID doesn’t do that. I don’t think they want to do that.

You’re allowing people to pay on a PPC basis to bubble up their name in search results, but why would somebody want to do that?
We pay for it. Right now we sponsor our members first and last name. Then their name will show like a paid ad on Google, Yahoo and MSN. We’re paying for it. We’re doing it to show how visible Ziki members can be. So that’s why it’s free. Some people would not pay for it because maybe they don’t feel the need or understand how it works. But if people just try it they will see. It only takes one hour to do the program. You sign up and someone just turns the switch on and you will see your name as an ad, a paid ad.

How are you making money?
We’re not, yet. We just started this in September and we’re introducing the interface allowing users to choose their own keywords. They can manage their own advertising campaigns. We make money by optimizing the campaigns on Google, Yahoo and MSN. Because of the optimization we can make money from it. Of course, it makes sense if we can multiply this two cents by many, many users. This none on our business models…

Are you reaching out for any particular partners?
So far we are trying to get as many members as we can to add interesting profiles, meaning, people with content. One day we would like to develop strong intra-communities, with some leaders who will generate content on specific topics. This the beauty of Ziki: it benefits you outside and inside the community.

What are your goals for 2007?
To increase the active membership base and the number of paying customers. That’s what we want to do. We want to be visible but we don’t want to grow too fast. We want to really listen to the members and see how they feel we should evolve.

Now by the end of 2007, let’s say the community grows nicely, the number of members has increased, then we can identify common areas in this community. What we strive to do one day is, for example, to create Ziki.jobs, and Ziki.tech, and many types of sub community. Instead of growing outside with no control, we’re trying to grow inside with quality profiles and have sub communities. Why is this important? By doing this, we create the identify of the community, it’s culture.  One of the objectives for us is to create a culture within Ziki. 

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email
  • Previous
  • 1
  • …
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • …
  • 13
  • Next
  • YouTube
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
Graphic featuring the logo of Courtland Brooks with the text 'We'll Help You Grow, Thrive & Exit' and bullet points for services including Strategy, Marketing, PR, Influencers, and Business Development.

OUR EVENTS

A blurred audience in a large venue with colorful lighting, featuring the bold text 'LTR US' in the foreground.

OUR SPONSORS

Logo of HubPeople featuring geometric shapes and the text 'HubPeople' in a modern font.
Logo of LeadThink, featuring the tagline 'YOUR GROWTH STARTS WITH US' and the description 'The #1 Destination for Early to Late-Stage Startups' in a combination of blue and pink text.

GOT NEWS?

Share your news at
tips@onlinepersonalswatch.com.

COURTLAND BROOKS

We help online dating & social businesses grow, thrive, and exit. See CourtlandBrooks.com.

CONTACT

Mark Brooks
CEO, Courtland Brooks
Publisher, Online Personals Watch
mark@courtlandbrooks.com

Irena Brooks
Editor, Online Personals Watch
irena@courtlandbrooks.com

©2025 Online Personals Watch