OPW — Oct 29 — Email me if you want me to send you a copy of some of my favorite marketing emails from leading internet dating companies. This week I received a promo email from Chemistry listing the top ten chat up lines. Here they are… – Mark Brooks
1. What's your sign?
2. Pardon me, I seem to have lost my phone number. Can I borrow yours?
3. You must be a broom, because you're sweeping me off my feet.
4. Do you have a license? Because you're driving me crazy.
5. I got a thirst. And baby, you look like my Gatorade.
6. Are you lost? Because heaven's a long way from here.
7. Are you religious? Because you're the answer to all my prayers.
8. Can I take your picture? I want Santa to know exactly what I want for Christmas.
9. Do you believe in love at first sight or should I walk by again?
10. Well, here I am. What are your other two wishes?
Chemistry had been losing traffic!
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=www.chemistry.com
Chemistry’s members pay low or any attention to “The Great Mate Debate” blog.
http://chemistry.typepad.com/
they should change the name to “Articles Nearly Nobody Reads”
The Nature of Love blog is freezed since March 28, 2007
http://www.helenfisher.typepad.com/
The U.S. (and World) online dating market remains enormous!
http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/11/111999/presentations/IAC_Personals.pdf
Unfortunately many Compatibility Tests are only fueled by Marketing Strategies and not by serious scientific evidence.
When
– Chemistry
– Parship
– Ulteem
– YahooPersonals
– PlentyOfFish
– PerfectMatch
– eHarmony
– Mary
– True
– other online dating sites
are going to publish serious scientific evidence (papers) proving that their matching methods work?
They should also have to specify three main things for the matching algorithm: ensemble, precision and how results are displayed.
Kindest Regards,
Fernando Ardenghi.
Buenos Aires.
Argentina.
ardenghifer@gmail.com
Chemistry had been losing traffic!
http://www.alexa.com/data/details/traffic_details?url=www.chemistry.com
Chemistry’s members pay low or any attention to “The Great Mate Debate” blog.
http://chemistry.typepad.com/
they should change the name to “Articles Nearly Nobody Reads”
The Nature of Love blog is freezed since March 28, 2007
http://www.helenfisher.typepad.com/
The U.S. (and World) online dating market remains enormous!
http://media.corporate-ir.net/media_files/irol/11/111999/presentations/IAC_Personals.pdf
Unfortunately many Compatibility Tests are only fueled by Marketing Strategies and not by serious scientific evidence.
When
– Chemistry
– Parship
– Ulteem
– YahooPersonals
– PlentyOfFish
– PerfectMatch
– eHarmony
– Mary
– True
– other online dating sites
are going to publish serious scientific evidence (papers) proving that their matching methods work?
They should also have to specify three main things for the matching algorithm: ensemble, precision and how results are displayed.
Kindest Regards,
Fernando Ardenghi.
Buenos Aires.
Argentina.
ardenghifer@gmail.com
Yes I would very much like to read your list of marketing emails from dating sites.
Yes I would very much like to read your list of marketing emails from dating sites.
I sure hope these chat up lines are a joke! Why waste customers’ and potential customers’ time with silly (and occasionally stupid) information like this, when websites could be presenting research-based tips to people that can have an immediate and positive impact in their dating lives?!
Thanks,
James Houran, Ph.D.
Online Dating Magazine
I sure hope these chat up lines are a joke! Why waste customers’ and potential customers’ time with silly (and occasionally stupid) information like this, when websites could be presenting research-based tips to people that can have an immediate and positive impact in their dating lives?!
Thanks,
James Houran, Ph.D.
Online Dating Magazine