White Label Dating 2nd Largest Paid Dating Site In UK

Posted on April 27, 2009

Whitelabeldating logo WLD BLOG — Apr 27 — According to the New Media
Age report, White Label Dating is now the second
largest paid dating site in the UK,
and the folks at WLD could not be more excited! “With the effective merger of
Meetic and Match this now means that we’re the number 2 paid dating site in the
UK…experiencing greater growth than all of our competitors over the past year
with visitors up 205%. It’s no wonder our partners want to choose the most
successful platform in the industry!”

See all posts on White Label Dating

6 thoughts on “White Label Dating 2nd Largest Paid Dating Site In UK”

  1. That’s great news. So are you confirming that the comscore figures are correct then?
    I guess you are.
    It’s difficult to know whether Hitwise, ComScor or Neilsen are right because they are all showing totally different charts.
    410k unique visitors per month isn’t bad really.
    I’d be interested in hearing whether any other dating companies get higher than this and theirs isn’t showing.

    Reply

  2. That’s great news. So are you confirming that the comscore figures are correct then?
    I guess you are.
    It’s difficult to know whether Hitwise, ComScor or Neilsen are right because they are all showing totally different charts.
    410k unique visitors per month isn’t bad really.
    I’d be interested in hearing whether any other dating companies get higher than this and theirs isn’t showing.

    Reply

  3. If they based the figures on what we believe they are, our traffic levels are almost five times that – the important thing to recognise is not the figure itself (which is five times smaller than our analytics show) but the trends, patterns and relative difference between sites they report on.
    I don’t think any of the main three are correct in terms of actual numbers, it’s the patterns and relativeness which counts.
    R

    Reply

  4. If they based the figures on what we believe they are, our traffic levels are almost five times that – the important thing to recognise is not the figure itself (which is five times smaller than our analytics show) but the trends, patterns and relative difference between sites they report on.
    I don’t think any of the main three are correct in terms of actual numbers, it’s the patterns and relativeness which counts.
    R

    Reply

Leave a Reply