SOCAL TECH – Aug 17 – eHarmony has run a study which determined that on
average, there are 542 people married every day in the U.S. due to the
web site. eHarmony said it it studeied marriages between January 1, 2008
through June 30, 2009. The study was released on the launch of
eHarmony's 10th anniversary ad campaign, which the firm says it will
begin airing today. FULL ARTICLE @ SOCAL TECH
From 2009 eHarmony Marriage Metrics Study:
http://download.eharmony.com/pdf/Harris-09-Executive-Summary.pdf
148,311 marriages and 1,130,006 non-married, monogamous relationships (ESTIMATED TO BE) started by eHarmony, between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009.
I do not trust that because:
eHarmony is a 10 years old obsolete site.
The success rate of eHarmony is less than 10%.
eHarmony is only supported by a big marketing budget and not by serious scientific evidence.
10 LONG YEARS AND eHarmony DOES NOT HAVE ANY SCIENTIFIC PAPER FOR PUBLIC AND ACADEMIC SCRUTINY OF FINDINGS.
eHarmony is not “scientifically proven” because eHarmony Labs could not prove eHarmony’s matching algorithm can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying relationships -and very low divorce rates- than couples matched by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one’s own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed Scientific Paper.
From 2009 eHarmony Marriage Metrics Study:
http://download.eharmony.com/pdf/Harris-09-Executive-Summary.pdf
148,311 marriages and 1,130,006 non-married, monogamous relationships (ESTIMATED TO BE) started by eHarmony, between January 1, 2008 and June 30, 2009.
I do not trust that because:
eHarmony is a 10 years old obsolete site.
The success rate of eHarmony is less than 10%.
eHarmony is only supported by a big marketing budget and not by serious scientific evidence.
10 LONG YEARS AND eHarmony DOES NOT HAVE ANY SCIENTIFIC PAPER FOR PUBLIC AND ACADEMIC SCRUTINY OF FINDINGS.
eHarmony is not “scientifically proven” because eHarmony Labs could not prove eHarmony’s matching algorithm can match prospective partners who will have more stable and satisfying relationships -and very low divorce rates- than couples matched by chance, astrological destiny, personal preferences, searching on one’s own, or other technique as the control group in a peer reviewed Scientific Paper.
Fernando! You’re right.
Fernando! You’re right.
trackback: http://sl2rllove.blogspot.com/
http://sl2rllove.blogspot.com/2010/08/happy-anniversary-eharmony.html
trackback: http://sl2rllove.blogspot.com/
http://sl2rllove.blogspot.com/2010/08/happy-anniversary-eharmony.html
I don’t believe any eHarmony stats.That stat is absolutely ridiculous and only an idiot would believe it.I’ve been online dating for 13 years and I’ve never met ONE person that says they’ve had success on the site,likes the site or recommends the site.
I don’t believe any eHarmony stats.That stat is absolutely ridiculous and only an idiot would believe it.I’ve been online dating for 13 years and I’ve never met ONE person that says they’ve had success on the site,likes the site or recommends the site.
a brief history of their badness: http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/08/17/eharmony_turns_ten
a brief history of their badness: http://www.salon.com/life/feature/2010/08/17/eharmony_turns_ten
For a company to have been around only ten years and to have expanded globally in such a competitive environment they must be doing something right!
For a company to have been around only ten years and to have expanded globally in such a competitive environment they must be doing something right!
You’re correct in your assumption. Eharmony is an over priced dating site that claims to be different and unique which is just nonsense.
You’re correct in your assumption. Eharmony is an over priced dating site that claims to be different and unique which is just nonsense.