Online Personals Watch
Menu
  • Home
  • About
  • Research
    • News by Company & Categories
    • News by Date
    • All Online Dating Statistics
    • Public Companies
    • Acquisitions
    • Funding Rounds
    • Top Online Dating Reporters
    • OPW in the Press
    • All Executive Interviews
  • Conferences
  • Courtland Brooks
  • Contact
  • Subscribe
Menu

More Catholic Singles Use Dating Sites

Posted on September 9, 2010

Catholicmatch logo new CATHOLIC SAN FRANCISCO – Sep 8 - CatholicMatch.com claims to be the largest Catholic dating site with 500K members. There are numerous other Catholic dating sites, including CatholicSingles.com, which says it has signed up ~500K members, and AveMariaSingles.com. All are eager to accommodate a very large pool of single adult Catholics – as many as 22.6M in the US in 2008, according to the Pew Forum on Religion & Public Life.

The full article was originally published at Catholic San Francisco, but is no longer available.

See all posts on CatholicMatch
See all posts on AveMariaSingles

Share this:

  • Share on X (Opens in new window) X
  • Share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window) LinkedIn
  • Share on Facebook (Opens in new window) Facebook
  • Email a link to a friend (Opens in new window) Email

Related


← Previous Post
Next Post →

10 thoughts on “More Catholic Singles Use Dating Sites”

  1. Unknown's avatar Sam Moorcroft, ChristianCafe.com says:
    September 9, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    How do you define a “member”? This term is bandied about by dating sites all the time. Some context is in order.
    a) Is a member a hit to the website?
    b) Is a member a unique visitor to the website?
    c) Is a member someone who has created an account, no matter how bare-bones?
    d) Is a member someone who has visited, ever (even if that was in 2003)?
    e) Is a member someone who has visited in the past year?
    f) Is a member someone who has visited in the past 3 months?
    g) Is a member someone who has visited in the past 2 weeks?
    Which is it? It isn’t 500,000 (if picking on CatholicMatch.com or CatholicSingles.com). It isn’t 12 million. It certainly isn’t 20 million.
    Here’s the acid test: how many unique users – with actual profiles – are on your site right at this moment? 200? 500? 1,000?
    That’s a more accurate measure than anything else. We have 649 online right now.
    Or, I could say we have (had) more than 2 million members. No, make that 5 million. Well, that’s true, too, when put in context. Otherwise, these are completely meaningless numbers.
    Sam

    Reply
  2. Unknown's avatar Sam Moorcroft, ChristianCafe.com says:
    September 9, 2010 at 9:56 pm

    How do you define a “member”? This term is bandied about by dating sites all the time. Some context is in order.
    a) Is a member a hit to the website?
    b) Is a member a unique visitor to the website?
    c) Is a member someone who has created an account, no matter how bare-bones?
    d) Is a member someone who has visited, ever (even if that was in 2003)?
    e) Is a member someone who has visited in the past year?
    f) Is a member someone who has visited in the past 3 months?
    g) Is a member someone who has visited in the past 2 weeks?
    Which is it? It isn’t 500,000 (if picking on CatholicMatch.com or CatholicSingles.com). It isn’t 12 million. It certainly isn’t 20 million.
    Here’s the acid test: how many unique users – with actual profiles – are on your site right at this moment? 200? 500? 1,000?
    That’s a more accurate measure than anything else. We have 649 online right now.
    Or, I could say we have (had) more than 2 million members. No, make that 5 million. Well, that’s true, too, when put in context. Otherwise, these are completely meaningless numbers.
    Sam

    Reply
  3. Unknown's avatar twitter.com/rosswilliams says:
    September 10, 2010 at 9:15 am

    As usual Sam, absolutely spot on.
    Member numbers mean nothing – I could buy 1million members for a few thousand dollars, it really is meaningless nowadays. I know of a few companies who have bought millions of profiles.
    What matters is online users – that’s far more meaningful, how many users are engaging with the site.
    And that’s what matters to our users – they don’t want to wade through thousands of stale (or fake!) profiles. They want genuine, active users who engage with the site and will respond to their communication. That’s how dating sites generate long-term SUSTAINABLE revenues through their users.
    Ross

    Reply
  4. Unknown's avatar twitter.com/rosswilliams says:
    September 10, 2010 at 9:15 am

    As usual Sam, absolutely spot on.
    Member numbers mean nothing – I could buy 1million members for a few thousand dollars, it really is meaningless nowadays. I know of a few companies who have bought millions of profiles.
    What matters is online users – that’s far more meaningful, how many users are engaging with the site.
    And that’s what matters to our users – they don’t want to wade through thousands of stale (or fake!) profiles. They want genuine, active users who engage with the site and will respond to their communication. That’s how dating sites generate long-term SUSTAINABLE revenues through their users.
    Ross

    Reply
  5. Saïd's avatar Saïd says:
    September 10, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @sam +1
    sam/ross, anyone else who runs a dating site: what constitutes an “active” member for you guys? i typically use a 3 month benchmark.

    Reply
  6. Saïd's avatar Saïd says:
    September 10, 2010 at 2:08 pm

    @sam +1
    sam/ross, anyone else who runs a dating site: what constitutes an “active” member for you guys? i typically use a 3 month benchmark.

    Reply
  7. Unknown's avatar Sam Moorcroft, ChristianCafe.com says:
    September 10, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    Said,
    Yeah, 3 months (of no activity) has been our benchmark for years. We go one step further: we auto-remove them nightly from the active database, to keep it fresh. Besides you and us, Said (and Ross?), what other dating sites do this? I don’t know of any. They are too busy claiming 500,000 or 1 million or 15 million profiles.
    As Ross said, “…users don’t want to wade through thousands of stale (or fake!) profiles….”
    Sam

    Reply
  8. Unknown's avatar Sam Moorcroft, ChristianCafe.com says:
    September 10, 2010 at 10:25 pm

    Said,
    Yeah, 3 months (of no activity) has been our benchmark for years. We go one step further: we auto-remove them nightly from the active database, to keep it fresh. Besides you and us, Said (and Ross?), what other dating sites do this? I don’t know of any. They are too busy claiming 500,000 or 1 million or 15 million profiles.
    As Ross said, “…users don’t want to wade through thousands of stale (or fake!) profiles….”
    Sam

    Reply
  9. Saïd's avatar Saïd says:
    September 13, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    thanks sam.

    Reply
  10. Saïd's avatar Saïd says:
    September 13, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    thanks sam.

    Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

  • YouTube
  • X
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
Graphic featuring the logo of Courtland Brooks with the text 'We'll Help You Grow, Thrive & Exit' and bullet points for services including Strategy, Marketing, PR, Influencers, and Business Development.

OUR EVENTS

A blurred audience in a large venue with colorful lighting, featuring the bold text 'LTR US' in the foreground.

OUR SPONSORS

Logo of HubPeople featuring geometric shapes and the text 'HubPeople' in a modern font.
Logo of InnerVue featuring stylized graphic elements and the brand name in elegant typography.
Logo of LeadThink, featuring the tagline 'YOUR GROWTH STARTS WITH US' and the description 'The #1 Destination for Early to Late-Stage Startups' in a combination of blue and pink text.

GOT NEWS?

Share your news at
tips@onlinepersonalswatch.com.

COURTLAND BROOKS

We help online dating & social businesses grow, thrive, and exit. See CourtlandBrooks.com.

CONTACT

Mark Brooks
CEO, Courtland Brooks
Publisher, Online Personals Watch
mark@courtlandbrooks.com

Irena Brooks
Editor, Online Personals Watch
irena@courtlandbrooks.com

©2026 Online Personals Watch